Page not found - Eagle Forum ↓
Menu ↓
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Education Center
    • Capitol Hill Office
    • Phyllis’ bio
    • Phyllis’ books
  • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Directory
    • State Leaders
    • Issues Chairmen
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
    • Order Materials
    • Links
  • Projects
    • House Meetings
    • Grassroots Email
    • EF Education
    • EF University
    • EF Collegians
    • Eagle Awards
    • Homemaker Awards
    • Teen Eagles
    • EF Archives
    • EF Court Watch
    • EF Amicus Briefs
  • Publications
    • Weekly Column
    • Monthly P.S. Report
    • Education Reporter
    • Blog
    • News & Notes
    • Press Releases
    • Legislative Alerts
  • Radio
    • Daily 3-Minute
    • Weekly Live Call-in
  • Events
    • EF Calendar
    • Recent Events
    • Eagle Council
    • Collegians Summit 2013
  • Topics

Eagle Forum

leading the pro-family movement since 1972

Donate Now!
Eagle Forum
Home Menu ↓
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Politics
    • Legislative Alerts
    • Congressional Candidate Questionnaire
    • Scoreboard
    • Town Hall Meetings
    • Mandate to Save America
    • The Most Powerful Office In The World
    • 2012
      • Bills to Watch 2012
      • Election Central 2012
      • 2012 Endorsed Candidates
  • Petition
    • People of Faith Who Oppose Amnesty
    • Protect Religious Freedom!
  • Email Subscribe
Follow @EagleForum on Twitter Follow Eagle Forum on Facebook Order Materials Sign-up for Eagle Forum Email! Eagle Forum Blog Listen to our podcast Eagle Forum on Pinterest! Eagle Forum's Amazon Store This site's RSS feed YouTube: video sharing

Sorry, no such page.

It seems we can’t find what you’re looking for. Perhaps searching, or one of the links below, can help.

Recent Posts

  • Phyllis Schlafly discusses marriage and the GOP
  • Watch Phyllis Schlafly at CPAC!
  • Schlafly urges GOP to reaffirm support of traditional marriage
  • Phyllis Schlafly Featured on PBS’ ‘Makers’ Broadcast

Most Used Categories

  • Obama (47)
  • Politics (36)
  • Popular (35)
  • Election 2012 (34)
  • Amnesty (21)
  • Education Reporter (14)
  • Immigration (13)
  • Book of the Month (12)
  • Common Core (12)
  • Columns (11)

Archives

Try looking in the monthly archives. :)

Tags

Amnesty book review China College College Loans Constitution COOL law Country Of Origin Labeling CRPD Declaration of Independence Dream Act economy education election Election2012 Endorsement English Language European Union Global Governance globalists God government Illegal Aliens Immigration jobs LOST marriage National Popular Vote NEA Obama ObamaCare outsourcing politics Pro-Life property rights religion Romney taxpayers Ten Commandments UN unemployment United Nations VAWA Voucher Program welfare

© 2013 - Eagle Forum Proudly powered by WordPress  Weaver II Pro by WP Weaver
↑
Eagle Forum Capitol Alert
Aug. 21, 2002

CEDAW Updates may be found in our Quick Topics Section under CEDAW.

Contact your Senators during the August recess
Enter your zip code, then select "info" to find district offices for your Senators.
CEDAW IN ACTION 
CEDAW Overrules National Laws
 
On August 5, 2002, the Committee of 23 "experts" converged on the United Nations headquarters in New York for the Exceptional Session of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). The first country up for review was Mexico. The "experts" had plenty of recommendations, including changes to the Mexican legal system.


Say Goodbye to the Constitution, Federalism, and Sovereignty

Patricia Espinosa Torres, President of the National Institute for Mexican Women, told the CEDAW committee, "Mexico compelled judges to use the Convention even if it contradicted national law . . . but judges had been reluctant to use the Convention's provisions. There had been cases, however, where the hierarchy of international treaties had come in second place after the Constitution."

Hanna Beate Schopp-Schilling, the "expert" from Germany said, "On the issue of federalism, she said it was deplorable that there seemed to be such a range of variations in both the legal situation for women across the 32 states, as well as in their de facto living situations. What legal means did the Government have under its constitution to unify states' laws with national and international legislation? Referring specifically to the differences in abortion law and educational standards, among others, she said federalism was no excuse for such far-reaching and negative implications for women."

Savitri Goonesekere, the "expert" from Sri Lanka, expressed concern about the progress of legislative reform. But she added that because so much progress depends on the Mexican judiciary "hopefully . . . the Government would address the need for gender-sensitivity training for lawyers."

To read to entire report, go to: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2002/wom1352.doc.htm


Through August 23, the CEDAW Committee will review compliance reports from 10 other countries. Stay tuned for more information about CEDAW's infringement on sovereignty.

Despite the radical changes to the U.S. legal system that would occur by ratifying CEDAW, the American Bar Association is pushing for Senate approval.

EAGLES TAKE ACTION: Make sure your Senators know about the legal dangers of CEDAW. Tell them to oppose ratification of this treaty.

 
Google Ads are provided by Google and are not selected or endorsed by Eagle Forum
Eagle Forum • PO Box 618 • Alton, IL 62002 • phone: 618-462-5415 • fax: 618-462-8909 • eagle@eagleforum.org