| |||
| |||
|
March 6, 2003
Senate to vote on PBA Ban again It's on the path to enactment! Call your Senators! |
![]() |
You've Done it Before -- Do it Again
On March 10, the Senate is expected to debate the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (S. 3), sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA). The bill prohibits partial-birth abortion (PBA), the gruesome and inhumane procedure that begins as a breech delivery of an unborn child and ends in infanticide. Congress has debated and voted on PBA many times since 1995. President Clinton twice vetoed the ban, first in 1996 and then again in 1998, and each time the Senate narrowly fell short of the two-thirds requirement to override the vetoes. We finally have a President who will sign the bill, but Congress must vote again to put it on Bush's desk.
Phony Health Exception: As in previous years, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) is expected to offer a substitute amendment to include a "health" exception to the ban. Partial-birth abortions are never necessary to save the mother's health. In fact, the opposite is true because this procedure can cause much damage to women's health and is a tremendously painful death for the child. Thus, Congress has a firm foundation on which to defeat this phony health amendment and pass a real ban. The vote on the Durbin amendment is the real test of whether Senators truly want to ban partial birth abortions. Reaffirmation of Roe v. Wade: Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) is expected to offer an amendment to attach a sense of the Congress resolution reaffirming that Roe v. Wade "secures an important constitutional right, and should not be overturned." In 1999, this amendment was offered and our effort to table (defeat) it failed 48 to 51. The vote will be close again!
Every Senator should be called, but special attention should be given to:
Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
|
| ||||||||||||