September 17, 1997
Now that Clinton has made a giant leap toward federalized health
insurance through KidCare, he is moving rapidly to federalize public
school curriculum through national reading tests for 4th graders and
national math tests for 8th graders. In both areas, he's using the
incremental approach to achieve total federal control of a large
segment of our society.
Liberalism may have lost its lustre, but its essence is marching
right ahead despite the Republican majority in Congress. The liberal
New York Times crowed in a recent front-page headline, "U.S.
Government Is Expanding Role in School Policy."
Clinton does not have Congressional approval for his national
tests, and Administration spokesmen boast that no Congressional action
will stop them from going full-speed ahead with the development of the
tests and plans to administer them in 1998. Fortunately, Congressman
Bill Goodling (R-PA), chairman of the House Education and Workforce
Committee, has taken up the challenge to oppose this terrible idea.
Clinton pleads that national tests should be acceptable because
there's no difference between math and reading standards in New York,
Texas or Idaho. He's dreaming. How to teach math and reading is
highly controversial, and it's impossible to construct a test without
knowing what the students are being taught.
Testing for math is no longer as simple as asking what is 2+2.
Will the national tests be written by those who believe it's important
to learn the multiplication tables, or by those who think that such
skills are obsolete because now we all use calculators?
Check the Internet and you'll discover what has happened to the
teaching of math. Will Clinton's national math test be based on Old
Math, New Math, Whole Math, New-New Math, Algebra Lite, or MTV Math?
The gulf between the different systems of reading instruction is
even wider. Will Clinton's national reading test be written to test
students who have been taught intensive, systematic phonics, or those
who have been taught Whole Language?
There is absolutely no way to have the national tests and the
"real, meaningful national standards" that Clinton demands unless the
students who take the tests have been taught what they will be tested
on. That's why national tests inevitably require a national
curriculum, plus federal standards for textbooks and teachers, and
that's why Clinton's promise that the tests will be "voluntary" is a
The math and reading tests will become the control mechanism by
which the federal Department of Education will determine the content of
local school curriculum. It doesn't really matter whether the feds
actually prescribe the content and the methodology, or whether the feds
just write the tests and then the local schools "teach to the test."
Clinton's words even belie his promise that the tests will be
voluntary. He said, "I believe every state must participate and that
every parent has a right to honest, accurate information about how his
or her child is doing."
Clinton's national tests have been greeted with enthusiasm by
business and the teachers unions, but only six Governors and 15 cities
have signed up. After the bureaucracy starts its carrot-and-stick
manipulation of federal grants, we can expect the cave-in to Big
Brother to begin.
Clinton tweaked the Governors for "dragging their feet" about
national tests. Former Tennessee Governor Lamar Alexander retorted,
"It's a good idea to drag your feet if you're going down the wrong
Anyone who has studied our recent experience with national
standards for United States history must realize how politics can
control both standards and tests. A high school social studies teacher
told me that three new social studies textbooks all pay homage to the
new gods of multiculturalism by teaching that we got our U.S.
Constitution from the Iroquois Indians.
The latest College Board Advanced Placement Examination in United
States History is a good example of how testing can be used for
political indoctrination of students. It requires the student to spend
45 minutes writing an essay based on six reading selections, two
pictures and two cartoons, all of which toe the feminist line about how
badly American women were allegedly treated from 1890 to 1925.
One of the cartoons shows a woman on the ground chained to a large
ball labelled "Unwanted Babies." The other cartoon depicts a bunch
of cigar-smoking, pot-bellied men saying, as they point to a group of
women going to church, "Let 'em sing an' pray -- we got th' votes and
make th' laws."
The test booklet makes it clear that "high scores" will depend
on the student citing what the instructions call the "evidence from
the documents." It is obvious than any student so foolhardy as to
advance an opinion contrary to the "evidence" would not receive a
Centralized control of the public schools through national testing
is a predictable failure just like centralized planning of the economy,
and America's children will be the losers. No wonder Goodling calls
Clinton's tests "the most controversial issue in Congress this year."