|
December 2, 1998
| Google Ads are provided by Google and are not selected or endorsed by Eagle Forum |
|
|
|
Media spin is disguising and distorting the facts that Americans need to know. Let's
puncture some of the spin.
Spin: The Republicans lost the 1998 Congressional elections. Fact: The Republicans
won the 1998 Congressional elections by electing a majority in both Houses of Congress for the
third straight time, the first time this has happened in our lifetime.
In the 435 House races, 500,000 more people voted for Republican candidates than for
Democratic candidates. In the gubernatorial races, 4.5 million more people voted for
Republicans than for Democrats, keeping the majority of Governors' mansions in Republican
hands.
Spin: The 1998 elections were a victory for "moderate," "centrist" candidates. It was
"the year of the moderate" as candidates "rushed to the center." Fact: The spectacular Senate
winners were pro-life conservatives Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL), Jim Bunning (R-KY) and Mike
Crapo (R-ID), plus pro-abortion liberals Charles Schumer (D-NY), Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and
Patty Murray (D-WA), all ideological partisans, not a "moderate" among them.
When Peter Fitzgerald won the Illinois Republican primary in March, defeating
"moderate" pro-abortion Loleta Didrickson who had been anointed by the Party establishment
and Bob Dole, the liberal media shed copious crocodile tears that the Republicans had kicked
away their best chance to defeat Carol Moseley-Braun. Typical of the reaction of all the pundits
was William Schneider's comment that Didrickson was "the perfect candidate, a moderate
woman who supports gun control and abortion rights." The voters disagreed.
Spin: Republican adherence to the pro-life cause is a loser. Fact: Smart Democrats are
starting to run pro-life candidates because they know it is a winner.
Three new Democratic Congressmen ran as pro-life conservatives: Ken Lucas in
Kentucky, Ronnie Shows in Mississippi, and David Phelps in Illinois. Other pro-life Democrats
came close to winning by running more pro-life than their pro-life Republican opponents:
Marjorie McKeithen in Louisiana (who almost unseated Rep. Richard Baker) and Glenn Poshard
(who ran a tight race for Governor of Illinois against George Ryan).
Ken Lucas's campaign material, mailed out by the Kentucky Democratic Party, described
him as "a pro-life, pro-family Christian. . . . No matter how small -- no matter what stage of life
-- Ken will fight to make sure life is respected and our children -- born and unborn -- are
protected."
Spin: The Democratic gains in the House are a gain for the liberals. Fact: The
Democratic Leadership Council claims that more than half of the 23 newly elected Democrats
are DLC's "New Democrats" who want to move their Party's ideology away from liberalism,
and some of them ran on agendas that are pro-business, fiscally responsible, anti-abortion, and
pro-school prayer.
Spin: The gender gap bodes a bleak future for Republicans because women vote for
liberal, pro-abortion Democrats. Fact: The gender differential depends on variables other than
ideology.
In Illinois, Peter Fitzgerald got 57 percent of the women's vote over Carol Moseley-Braun; in Texas, Governor George W. Bush got 75 percent of the women's vote. Women
employed outside the home voted 55-42 percent Democratic, while women who are not
employed outside the home voted 52-42 percent Republican.
Spin: Clinton's harangues about Social Security were a big reason why Republicans lost
seats in Congress. Fact: Voters age 60 and over weren't fooled; they voted 55-45 percent for
Republican candidates.
However, the middle-age voters (aged 45 to 59, who are paying high Social Security
taxes and worrying they will never get back what they pay in) voted Democratic, 52-48 percent.
That should send a message to Republicans because this age group had previously voted 53-47
percent for Republicans.
Spin: After the election, the Republicans sank into "chaos" and engaged in "bloodletting"
in their contest for new leaders. Fact: Newt Gingrich's prompt and graceful exit paved the way
for the orderly and harmonious election of new leaders, including the unanimous election of the
new Speaker.
Spin: The 1998 elections prove that the people want Congress to abandon its plans for
impeachment. Fact: Clinton was not on the ballot, and there is no evidence that his behavior
was the reason why any Republican or Democratic candidate was elected or defeated.
Spin: Impeachment is too drastic a punishment for Clinton's admittedly shameful
behavior. Fact: Impeachment is exactly the proper and constitutional remedy because
impeachment is merely a formal resolution by the House that Clinton's behavior is unacceptable
(which it is).
Impeachment doesn't convict him, doesn't remove him from office, and doesn't send him
to jail. After impeachment, it becomes the Senate's task to decide whether removal from office
is the punishment that fits the crime.
The clearest message of the recent election is that Republicans must stand for something
in order to win. Any ambivalence by Republicans about impeaching a President who has
obstructed justice will only cause a repeat of the disappointments of the last election.
|