| VOL. 5, NO. 3 | Mar. 17, 2003 | |
|
"Terminal Silliness:" The Latest Numbers in the War over Federal Judicial Nominations | |
|
By Virginia C. Armstrong, Ph.D., National Chairman, Eagle Forum's Court Watch
The Democrats' "filibuster" of Miguel Estrada's nomination to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia continues in the U. S. Senate. These Senate gyrations bring to mind one of USSC Justice Antonin Scalia's phrases, "terminal silliness." But action to fill other federal court vacancies continues, as does Democrat obstructionism. The latest statistics compiled by the Judicial Selection Monitoring Project show the following: Current Vacancies
Bush Nominees, May 9, 2001-March 17, 2003
Most Contested Nominations in 2003
(All of the following were included in President Bush's first group of judicial nominees on May 9, 2001)
YOU Can Help!!! Regardless of where you live, phone the following Senators and urge them to support cloture, which requires 60 votes (all phone numbers have the "202" prefix): Bayh (IN) 224-5623; Graham (FL) 224-3041; Pryor (AK) 224-2353; Lincoln (AR) 224-4843; Hollings (SC) 224-6121; Byrd (WV) 224-3954; Landrieu (LA) 224-5824; Bingaman (NM) 224-5521 Gain important additional insight into the unprecedented use of the filibuster for appellate court nominees by reading Phyllis Schlafly's column, "Bring On A Real Filibuster," and Democrat Senator Zell Miller's article, "41 is Greater Than 59." |